Mt. Pleasant (989) 772-1209 | Midland (989) 631-9500
Robert F. Murray & Co CPAs PC

All posts in Planning & Strategies

Written by: Tina Powell, CPA

As a shareholder of an S Corporation, you may think that you can just take the money you need as dividends.  That is somewhat true, but like all tax laws, there is a gray fuzzy line that shouldn’t be crossed.

The advantage of an S corporation over an LLC or sole proprietorship is that a shareholder’s share of the company’s net income is not considered self-employment earnings and therefore is not subject to payroll taxes or self-employment tax.  However, if a shareholder provides services to the S Corporation, they must receive an adequate or reasonable amount of compensation. The compensation is deductible, but is subject to Social Security Tax, Medicare Tax and Federal and State Unemployment Taxes.  So in an effort to minimize these taxes, owners tend to minimize compensation.  The IRS has been pursuing and winning cases of perceived abuse of inadequate compensation in favor of dividend distributions to shareholder-employees, so it is important to ensure that you can substantiate “reasonable compensation.”

The IRS looks at many factors in determining reasonable compensation including the following: 

  • Training and Experience                                               
  • Duties and Responsibilities
  • Dividend History                                              
  • Time and Effort Devoted to the Business
  • Timing of Bonuses                                          
  • Payments to Non-Shareholder Employees
  • Comparable Compensation Similar         
  • Use of a Formula to Determine Compensation
  • Businesses Pay for Similar Services         
  • Compensation Agreements

The key to defending your claim to reasonable compensation is to document all research to support the amount of compensation.  The IRS has the authority to reclassify dividends, distributions or payments to the shareholder-employee, including loan repayments, as compensation if it deems compensation is inadequate or unreasonable.  The courts have held that reasonable compensation is one of fact, determined on a case-by-case basis.  So if you have your support or documentation, you are in a better position to avoid reclassification.

The S corporation entity form provides planning opportunities to avoid payroll taxes or self-employment taxes.  With the increase in Medicare tax as a result of Obama Care scheduled to begin in 2013, this may represent a larger opportunity.


By: Heather I-D Graham, CPA, CVA

Drafting Buy-Sell Agreements requires that special consideration be given to a number of special rules that affect valuations for estate and gift tax purposed.  For example, options to acquire property at less than FMV and restrictions on the right to sell property are generally disregarded in determining value.  An independent valuation, or the assistance of a valuator in deriving a formula approximating FMV at the date of the agreement helps insure the proper tax result of the Buy-Sell agreement.  Buy-Sell Agreements also have numerous other non-tax issues, all of which can be enhanced by a proper valuation formula.

The business valuation formula can be different or each business, depending on the industry, risks, and case circumstances.  If you need professional assistance, pelase give us a call.


To reflect the recent increase in gas prices, the IRS raised the standard mileage rates for the last six months of the year. The rate will increase to 55.5 cents per mile for business miles driven from 7/1/11 through 12/31/11, a 4.5 cent per mile increase from the rate in effect for the first six months of 2011 [see Rev. Proc. 2010-51 (2010-51 IRB 883) ].

 The rate for computing deductible medical or moving expenses will also increase by 4.5 cents per mile to 23.5 cents per mile, up from 19 cents per mile for the first six months of 2011. The rate for providing services for a charity is set by statute, and remains at 14 cents per mile.


The estate and gift tax changes in the recently enacted 2010 Tax Relief Act. Before the new law, there was no estate tax for 2010, but some beneficiaries could have faced higher taxes because there were less favorable income tax basis rules. Also, under the prior law, estate and other transfer taxes were scheduled to rise substantially for post-2010 transfers.

If this affects you, please read the details of the changes in our recent letter and firm publication here:  “Tax Relief Act 2010 – Letter re:  Estate and Gift Tax Changes